 - group
- group
 be the nonabelian
group of order
 be the nonabelian
group of order  and
 and  be the cyclic group of order
 be the cyclic group of order  .
Put
.
Put 
 and note that
 and note that  is not a
 is not a  -group but is in 
the class mentioned in the title. 
This example will motivate some of our results.
-group but is in 
the class mentioned in the title. 
This example will motivate some of our results.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
LEXINGTON, KY 40506-0027
clark at ms.uky.edu
 -groups
-groups
 -groups are the
groups in which normality is transitive.
One can generalize the concept of a
-groups are the
groups in which normality is transitive.
One can generalize the concept of a 
 -group by requiring
Sylow-permutability to be transitive.  We call
-group by requiring
Sylow-permutability to be transitive.  We call  a
 a 
 -group if
whenever
-group if
whenever  permutes with the Sylow subgroups of
 permutes with the Sylow subgroups of  and
 and  permutes with
the Sylow subgroups of
 permutes with
the Sylow subgroups of  we have
 we have  permutes with the Sylow subgroups of
 permutes with the Sylow subgroups of
 .  Let us say
.  Let us say  satisfies the property
 satisfies the property 
 if every subgroup
of a Sylow
 if every subgroup
of a Sylow
 -subgroup
-subgroup  of
 of  is normal in
 is normal in  .  Also, let us
say
.  Also, let us
say  satisfies the property
 satisfies the property 
 if for every Sylow
 if for every Sylow  -subgroup
-subgroup
 of
 of  we have
 we have 
 implies
 implies  permutes with the Sylow
subgroups of
 permutes with the Sylow
subgroups of  .
M. Asaad has shown in a recent paper that
.
M. Asaad has shown in a recent paper that  is a solvable
 is a solvable 
 -group
if and only if
-group
if and only if  satisfies the property
 satisfies the property 
 for all primes
 for all primes  dividing the order of
dividing the order of  , the generalized Fitting subgroup of
, the generalized Fitting subgroup of  .
We wish to discuss a proof for the following theorem:
.
We wish to discuss a proof for the following theorem:
 is a solvable
 is a solvable 
 -group
if and only if
-group
if and only if  satisfies the property
 satisfies the property 
 for all primes
 for all primes  dividing the order of
dividing the order of  .
.This is joint work with Adolfo Ballester-Bolinches and Ramon Esteban-Romero.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS
AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY
3348 WALTON DR.
MONTGOMERY AL  36111
mragland at mail.aum.edu
 and
 and  , 
a subgroup
, 
a subgroup  of a group
 of a group  may or may not possess one or 
both of the following properties:
 may or may not possess one or 
both of the following properties:
 -transitivity:  
Every
-transitivity:  
Every  -subgroup of
-subgroup of  is a
 is a  -subgroup of
-subgroup of  .
.
 -persistence:  
Every
-persistence:  
Every  -subgroup of
-subgroup of  in
 in  is an
 
is an  -subgroup of
-subgroup of  .
.
We will present some elementary results and discuss examples of
 -transitive and
-transitive and 
 -persistent subgroups.
-persistent subgroups.
ALFRED UNIVERSITY
SAXON DRIVE
ALFRED, NY  14802
petrillo at alfred.edu
A finite primitive permutation group  is extremely primitive if a point
stabiliser
 is extremely primitive if a point
stabiliser  is primitive on each of its orbits. Cyclic groups of prime
order, and doubly primitive groups provide infinite families of
examples. Efforts to classify the remaining examples (non-regular,
simply primitive) are the subject of the lecture. 
A result of W. A. Manning from 1927
tells us that the stabiliser H acts faithfully on each of its
non-trivial orbits. Thus we have an embedding of a primitive group
 is primitive on each of its orbits. Cyclic groups of prime
order, and doubly primitive groups provide infinite families of
examples. Efforts to classify the remaining examples (non-regular,
simply primitive) are the subject of the lecture. 
A result of W. A. Manning from 1927
tells us that the stabiliser H acts faithfully on each of its
non-trivial orbits. Thus we have an embedding of a primitive group  (or, rather, several primitive actions of
(or, rather, several primitive actions of  ) in a larger primitive group
) in a larger primitive group
 . Specific examples of this embedding problem led to the construction
of several of the sporadic simple groups, and indeed sporadic groups
provide interesting examples of extremely primitive groups. The
classification divides into two cases - almost simple and affine - each
of which contributes interesting lists of examples.  Our aim is to prove
that our lists are complete up to a finite number of exceptions. We have
achieved this in the affine case; the specificity of our results depends
on the strength of asymptotic bounds on the number of maximal subgroups
of almost simple groups.
. Specific examples of this embedding problem led to the construction
of several of the sporadic simple groups, and indeed sporadic groups
provide interesting examples of extremely primitive groups. The
classification divides into two cases - almost simple and affine - each
of which contributes interesting lists of examples.  Our aim is to prove
that our lists are complete up to a finite number of exceptions. We have
achieved this in the affine case; the specificity of our results depends
on the strength of asymptotic bounds on the number of maximal subgroups
of almost simple groups.
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
COLUMBUS, OH 43210
akos at math.ohio-state.edu
 if and only if the commutator operation is associative.  
Recently, Geoghegan and Guzman showed that a group is 
solvable if and only if the commutator operation eventually satisfies 
all instances of the generalized
associative law.  
In this talk we discuss solvability and nilpotency
of groups whose commutator operation satisfies one of the
four-variable instances of the associative law.
 if and only if the commutator operation is associative.  
Recently, Geoghegan and Guzman showed that a group is 
solvable if and only if the commutator operation eventually satisfies 
all instances of the generalized
associative law.  
In this talk we discuss solvability and nilpotency
of groups whose commutator operation satisfies one of the
four-variable instances of the associative law.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY
BINGHAMTON, NY. 13902-6000
fer at math.binghamton.edu
 from a dynamical viewpoint
 from a dynamical viewpoint
 can be defined as an automorphism 
of a certain algebra or as a self homeomorphism of the Cantor set. 
Thus, the dynamics of an element of
 can be defined as an automorphism 
of a certain algebra or as a self homeomorphism of the Cantor set. 
Thus, the dynamics of an element of  can be studied. 
We analize the dynamics and use the analysis to give another 
solution of the conjugacy problem in
 can be studied. 
We analize the dynamics and use the analysis to give another 
solution of the conjugacy problem in  .
.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY
BINGHAMTON, NY. 13902-6000
salazar at math.binghamton.edu
CENTER FOR COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH
4320 WESTERRA CT
SAN DIEGO, CA  92121
larry at ccrwest.org
 a prime number. Fusion systems on finite
 a prime number. Fusion systems on finite  -groups were
introduced by L. Puig
and provide an axiomatic framework for studying the
-groups were
introduced by L. Puig
and provide an axiomatic framework for studying the  -local structure
(also called
-local structure
(also called  -fusion)
in finite groups. The p-local structure of a finite group
-fusion)
in finite groups. The p-local structure of a finite group  is given by the
conjugation with elements of
 is given by the
conjugation with elements of  between the
subgroups of a Sylow
 between the
subgroups of a Sylow  -subgroup of
-subgroup of  . This axiomatic view point has
been very
useful in determining many properties of finite
groups and of the
. This axiomatic view point has
been very
useful in determining many properties of finite
groups and of the  -completion of their classifying spaces as well as in
modular
representation theory and it underlies the theory of
-completion of their classifying spaces as well as in
modular
representation theory and it underlies the theory of  -local finite groups
developed by C. Broto, R. Levi and B. Oliver.
-local finite groups
developed by C. Broto, R. Levi and B. Oliver.
So, the  -local structure of a finite group gives a fusion system. But
there are examples
of fusion systems that do not occur in this way. We call these examples
exotic fusion systems.
Let
-local structure of a finite group gives a fusion system. But
there are examples
of fusion systems that do not occur in this way. We call these examples
exotic fusion systems.
Let  be an algebraically closed field of characteristic
 be an algebraically closed field of characteristic  and
 and  a
finite group.
An interesting question for fusion systems is whether they can be obtained
from the local
structure of a block of the group algebra
 a
finite group.
An interesting question for fusion systems is whether they can be obtained
from the local
structure of a block of the group algebra  . In this talk I present a
joint work with Radha Kessar on some methods to reduce this question to
the case when
. In this talk I present a
joint work with Radha Kessar on some methods to reduce this question to
the case when  is a
central
 is a
central  -extension of a simple group. As an application of our result,
we obtain that
the exotic fusion systems discovered by A. Ruiz and A. Viruel do not occur
as fusion systems of
-extension of a simple group. As an application of our result,
we obtain that
the exotic fusion systems discovered by A. Ruiz and A. Viruel do not occur
as fusion systems of  -blocks of finite groups.
-blocks of finite groups.
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
COLUMBUS, OH 43210
stancu at math.ohio-state.edu
 for a group
 for a group  .
.
For a group  the function
 the function 
 denotes the smallest 
integer
 denotes the smallest 
integer  such that every element of the commutator subgroup
 such that every element of the commutator subgroup  is a product of
 
is a product of  commutators.  The statement that the set of
commutators of a group
 commutators.  The statement that the set of
commutators of a group  does not form a subgroup is equivalent 
to
 does not form a subgroup is equivalent 
to 
 . For every prime
. For every prime  , Guralnick has constructed 
a
, Guralnick has constructed 
a  -group
-group  of order
 of order  with
 with 
 . 
For Cassidy's group
. 
For Cassidy's group  we have
 we have 
 . 
However for given
. 
However for given  and any prime
 and any prime  , the group
, the group  has a suitable homomorphic image
 
has a suitable homomorphic image 
 such 
that
 such 
that 
 and
 and  has order
 has order
 , where
, where  is a linear function in
 is a linear function in  .
.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY
BINGHAMTON, NY. 13902-6000
menger at math.binghamton.edu
 , what is the smallest nonabelian group whose order is divisible by
, what is the smallest nonabelian group whose order is divisible by  ?
?
 ,
, 
 with order
 
with order 
 is the smallest nonabelian
simple group whose order is divisible by
 is the smallest nonabelian
simple group whose order is divisible by  . For
. For  and
 and  the 
group in question is
 the 
group in question is  , the alternating group on
, the alternating group on  letters.
 letters.
This answers a question posed at the Zassenhaus Conference 2005. It also strengthens the following result presented at the conference:
 be a prime and let
 be a prime and let  denote the order of the smallest group in which the elements of order dividing
 denote the order of the smallest group in which the elements of order dividing  do not form a subgroup. 
Then
do not form a subgroup. 
Then
 where
 where
 is the smallest integer for which
 is the smallest integer for which  is a prime power.
 is a prime power.
In our earlier result  was defined only as
 was defined only as 
 , 
where
, 
where  is the order of the smallest simple group in which the
elements of order
 is the order of the smallest simple group in which the
elements of order  do not form a subgroup.
 do not form a subgroup.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY
BINGHAMTON, NY. 13902-6000
mendoza at math.binghamton.edu
We say that a finite group  satisfies the
one-prime hypothesis if the greatest common
divisor of every pair of distinct ordinary
irreducible character degrees is either
 satisfies the
one-prime hypothesis if the greatest common
divisor of every pair of distinct ordinary
irreducible character degrees is either  or a
prime. In earlier work, Lewis was able to prove a
bound on the number of character degrees for a
solvable group
 or a
prime. In earlier work, Lewis was able to prove a
bound on the number of character degrees for a
solvable group  satisfying the one-prime
hypothesis and to show that the bound is best
possible.
 satisfying the one-prime
hypothesis and to show that the bound is best
possible.
The aim of this paper is to classify the
nonsolvable groups satisfying the one-prime
hypothesis and to bound the number of character
degrees for such groups. In the first part, we
determine all almost simple groups, i.e., groups
 satisfying
 satisfying 
 for a
nonabelian simple group
 for a
nonabelian simple group  , satisfying the
one-prime hypothesis. In particular, we show that
, satisfying the
one-prime hypothesis. In particular, we show that
 must be one of
 must be one of  , the Suzuki group
, the Suzuki group
 , or
, or 
 with
with  a power of a prime.
 a power of a prime.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES 
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY 
KENT, OH 44242 
white at math.kent.edu
Let  be a finite group, and let
 be a finite group, and let 
 be the set of 
irreducible character degrees
of
 be the set of 
irreducible character degrees
of  .  
We say that
.  
We say that  satisfies the One-prime hypothesis 
if whenever
 satisfies the One-prime hypothesis 
if whenever 
 and
 and  , then the greatest common
divisor of
, then the greatest common
divisor of  and
 and  is either
 is either  or a prime.  
In an earlier series of papers, I showed that if
 or a prime.  
In an earlier series of papers, I showed that if  is 
solvable and satisfies the one-prime
hypothesis, then
 is 
solvable and satisfies the one-prime
hypothesis, then 
 , and 
I gave examples of solvable groups satisfying the one-prime 
hypothesis where the bound is met.  In
this talk, I will show that if
, and 
I gave examples of solvable groups satisfying the one-prime 
hypothesis where the bound is met.  In
this talk, I will show that if  is a nonsolvable group 
satisfying the one-prime hypothesis, then
 is a nonsolvable group 
satisfying the one-prime hypothesis, then 
 .  
In particular, I will show how classifying the almost simple 
groups that satisfy the one-prime
hypothesis can be used to classify the nonsolvable groups 
that satisfy the one-prime hypothesis.
.  
In particular, I will show how classifying the almost simple 
groups that satisfy the one-prime
hypothesis can be used to classify the nonsolvable groups 
that satisfy the one-prime hypothesis.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES 
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY 
KENT, OH 44242 
lewis at math.kent.edu
 necessarily has a lift (i.e. an ordinary irreducible 
character whose restriction to
 necessarily has a lift (i.e. an ordinary irreducible 
character whose restriction to  -regular elements is that Brauer character).  
In this talk we will demonstrate methods for generating many such lifts, 
and we will show upper and lower bounds on the number of lifts of a 
Brauer character in terms of the nucleus and vertex of the character, 
which are certain subgroups of
-regular elements is that Brauer character).  
In this talk we will demonstrate methods for generating many such lifts, 
and we will show upper and lower bounds on the number of lifts of a 
Brauer character in terms of the nucleus and vertex of the character, 
which are certain subgroups of  determined (up to conjugacy) by the 
Brauer character.
 determined (up to conjugacy) by the 
Brauer character.
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
6001 E PIMA ST APT 83
cossey at math.arizona.edu
 -groups
-groups
 and positive integers
 and positive integers  and
 and  , 
we seek to classify up to isomorphism all the monolithic subgroups 
of the regular wreath product group
, 
we seek to classify up to isomorphism all the monolithic subgroups 
of the regular wreath product group 
 . 
(This has already been done in case
. 
(This has already been done in case  .) 
In order to recognize when two such subgroups are not isomorphic 
to each other, efficient methods are needed for calculating 
isomorphism invariants (such as nilpotence class, order of the center) 
for each in this vast collection of subgroups. For this purpose, 
we have determined a general yet reasonably practical method for 
counting the number of elements of each order in each of these subgroups.
.) 
In order to recognize when two such subgroups are not isomorphic 
to each other, efficient methods are needed for calculating 
isomorphism invariants (such as nilpotence class, order of the center) 
for each in this vast collection of subgroups. For this purpose, 
we have determined a general yet reasonably practical method for 
counting the number of elements of each order in each of these subgroups.
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON
250 BUCHTEL COMMON
AKRON, OH 44325-4002
riedl at uakron.edu
 -problem
-problem
 -problem deals with the general question of 
how the number of conjugacy classes of the semidirect product
-problem deals with the general question of 
how the number of conjugacy classes of the semidirect product  is bounded in terms of the cardinality of
is bounded in terms of the cardinality of  , where
, where  is a 
finite group and
 is a 
finite group and  is a finite faithful
 is a finite faithful  -module. 
We present some arguments that may be useful in an inductive approach 
to this problem.
-module. 
We present some arguments that may be useful in an inductive approach 
to this problem.
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
601 UNIVERSITY DRIVE
SAN MARCOS, TX 78666
keller at txstate.edu
 -groups.  
I will proceed to show that any group that contains the norm is also 
a normalizer in the group.
-groups.  
I will proceed to show that any group that contains the norm is also 
a normalizer in the group.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY
BINGHAMTON, NY. 13902-6000
smith at math.binghamton.edu
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
220 NORTH GRAND, RITTER HALL ROOM 233
ST. LOUIS, MO 63103
jacksoda at slu.edu
 
 will be discussed as well as the example when
 
will be discussed as well as the example when  .  
Included will be an examination of some relationships between the 
Weyl groups of
.  
Included will be an examination of some relationships between the 
Weyl groups of  and
 and  including their Coxeter elements.
 including their Coxeter elements.
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
220 NORTH GRAND, RITTER HALL ROOM 233
ST. LOUIS, MO 63103
rainbolt at slu.edu
 .  Then I will show that for 
a certain class of Nilpotent blocks we can reduce Puig's conjecture 
to central
.  Then I will show that for 
a certain class of Nilpotent blocks we can reduce Puig's conjecture 
to central  -extensions of simple groups.
-extensions of simple groups.
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
231 W. 18TH AVENUE
COLUMBUS, OH. 43210
salminen at math.ohio-state.edu
 for
 for  , 
we see that a number of well known results for supersolvable 
groups generalize to groups of polycyclic breadth
, 
we see that a number of well known results for supersolvable 
groups generalize to groups of polycyclic breadth  . 
This generalization of supersolvability is especially strong for the 
groups of polycyclic breadth
. 
This generalization of supersolvability is especially strong for the 
groups of polycyclic breadth  .
.
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS
AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY
3348 WALTON DR.
MONTGOMERY AL  36111
tfoguel at mail.aum.edu
 be a finite group and
 be a finite group and 
 be the conjugacy class of
 
be the conjugacy class of  in
in  .  Set
.  Set 
![$ [a,G]=\{a^{-1} a^g\mid g\in G\}$](img124.png) . 
We can check that
. 
We can check that 
![$ a^G=a[a,G]$](img125.png) and thus
 and thus 
![$ \vert a^G\vert=\vert[a,G]\vert$](img126.png) .
.
Let  and
 and  be conjugacy classes of
 be conjugacy classes of  and
 and 
 be the product of
 be the product of  and
 
and  . We can check
that
. We can check
that  is a
 is a  -invariant subset of
-invariant subset of  , 
that is
, 
that is 
 for any
 for any 
 and any
 and any  . Also, we can check that because
. Also, we can check that because 
 is a
 is a  -invariant subset of
-invariant subset of  , then
, then  is the union of
 
is the union of  distinct conjugacy classes
 distinct conjugacy classes 
  , for some integer
, for some integer  , and the conjugacy class
, and the conjugacy class  is a subset of
 is a subset of 
 . Set
. Set 
 .
.
Under what circumstances is  also a conjugacy 
class, i.e.
 also a conjugacy 
class, i.e. 
 ? In this talk, we will prove the following
? In this talk, we will prove the following 
 be a finite group,
 be a finite group, 
 and
 and  be conjugacy classes of
 be conjugacy classes of  . Assume that
. Assume that
 . Then
. Then   
 if and only if
 if and only if 
![$ [a,G]=[b,G]=[ab,G]$](img140.png) is a subgroup of
 is a subgroup of  .
.We will use the previous result to prove the following
 be a finite nonabelian simple group and
 be a finite nonabelian simple group and  be a conjugacy class of
 
be a conjugacy class of  . 
Then
. 
Then 
 if and only if
 if and only if   .
.
We turn then our attention when 
 . We wonder what kind 
of relationships exist among
. We wonder what kind 
of relationships exist among 
 ,
,  ,
,  and 
the structure of the group
 and 
the structure of the group  .
.
We consider the situation where, in addition, the group  is a
 is a 
 -group for some prime
-group for some prime  , that is the size of the set
, that is the size of the set  is a power of
 
is a power of  . 
We can check then that given any conjugacy class
. 
We can check then that given any conjugacy class  , the size of
, the size of 
 is a power of
 is a power of  , that is
, that is  for some integer
 for some integer  .
. 
Let  be a finite
 be a finite  -group, for some prime
-group, for some prime  ,
and
,
and  be a conjugacy classes of
 be a conjugacy classes of  with
 with  , for some
integer
, for some
integer  . Then
. Then 
 
We will mention then other results in products of 
conjugacy classes and finite  -groups.
The talk  will be based on my papers 
``On nilpotent groups and conjugacy classes", 
``Homogeneous products of conjugacy classes" and
``Products of conjugacy classes and finite
-groups.
The talk  will be based on my papers 
``On nilpotent groups and conjugacy classes", 
``Homogeneous products of conjugacy classes" and
``Products of conjugacy classes and finite  -groups". Those 
papers are available on www.arxiv.org.
-groups". Those 
papers are available on www.arxiv.org.
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI GULF COAST
730 EAST BEACH BOULEVARD
LONG BEACH MS 39560
Edith.Bante at usm.edu
We present characterizations of the injectors of a finite solvable group that are independent of the original definition of injector using Fitting sets. This can be considered a solution to a problem posed by Doerk and Hawkes in their book Finite Soluble Groups.
FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE
LANCASTER, PA 17604-3003
afeldman at fandm.edu
 such that the symmetric group Sym
 such that the symmetric group Sym embeds in Sym
 embeds in Sym as a maximal subgroup.  One family of such pairs is obtained when
 
as a maximal subgroup.  One family of such pairs is obtained when 
 .  Kaluznin and Klin and Halberstadt provided an 
additional infinite family.  This talk will present a third 
infinite family of ordered pairs and show that no other pairs exist.
.  Kaluznin and Klin and Halberstadt provided an 
additional infinite family.  This talk will present a third 
infinite family of ordered pairs and show that no other pairs exist.
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
ONE OXFORD STREET
CAMBRIDGE, MA 02128
benesh at math.harvard.edu
 be a square matrix with minimal polynomial
 be a square matrix with minimal polynomial  and  
eigenvalue
 and  
eigenvalue  such that
 such that 
 .  
Then the non-zero columns of
.  
Then the non-zero columns of  are eigenvectors of
 are eigenvectors of  .
.
The proof is trivial. The main significance is that this observation 
often yields the eigenvectors more easily than finding the reduced 
row echelon form of  . In particular,
. In particular,  may not be known exactly.  
Let
 may not be known exactly.  
Let 
 be the approximation for
 be the approximation for  .   Then
.   Then 
 invertible, 
so the eigenvectors can not be found in the usual way. 
In this situation reasonably good approximations for the eigenvectors 
may be found.
 
invertible, 
so the eigenvectors can not be found in the usual way. 
In this situation reasonably good approximations for the eigenvectors 
may be found.
MIAMI UNIVERSITY
OXFORD, OH 45056
holmescs at muohio.edu
 be a finitely generated (f.g.) nonabelian free group. 
O. Kharlampovich and A. Myasnikov proved that any f.g. group
 be a finitely generated (f.g.) nonabelian free group. 
O. Kharlampovich and A. Myasnikov proved that any f.g. group  containing a distinguished copy of
 
containing a distinguished copy of  (
 ( is called an
 is called an  -group 
in the algebraic geometry over groups) is universally equivalent to
-group 
in the algebraic geometry over groups) is universally equivalent to  ( i.e., satisfies precisely the same universal sentences as
 
( i.e., satisfies precisely the same universal sentences as  does in a first order language appropriate for group theory where 
all the elements of
 
does in a first order language appropriate for group theory where 
all the elements of  are taken as constants - called the language of
 are taken as constants - called the language of  )
if and only if there is an embedding of
)
if and only if there is an embedding of  into a Lyndon's free 
exponential group,
 into a Lyndon's free 
exponential group, 
![$ F^{(Z[t])}$](img160.png) , which is the identity on
 , which is the identity on  (this is called an
 
(this is called an  -embedding in the algebraic geometry over groups). 
Alexei Myasnikov then posed the question as to whether or not a similar 
result holds for f.g. free nilpotent groups with Lyndon's group replaced 
with Philip Hall's completion with respect to a suitable binomial ring. 
We (Dennis Spellman and I) answered Alexei's question in the affirmative. 
This talk will explain our answer.
-embedding in the algebraic geometry over groups). 
Alexei Myasnikov then posed the question as to whether or not a similar 
result holds for f.g. free nilpotent groups with Lyndon's group replaced 
with Philip Hall's completion with respect to a suitable binomial ring. 
We (Dennis Spellman and I) answered Alexei's question in the affirmative. 
This talk will explain our answer. 
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS
U.S. NAVAL ACADEMY
572C HOLLOWAY ROAD
ANNAPOLIS, MD 21402-5002
amg at usna.edu